![]() ![]() However, there were some historians who tried to discover the truth but were either ignored or silenced. Romila Thapar, Sathish Chandra, Ram Sharan Sharma are such kind of Indian historians. As a result, they followed the earlier western historians and added more biased version while creating history books for schools, colleges and universities. And just as Mark Antonys narrative is designed to rouse and inspire his audience, so Keays history of the East India Company is designed to rouse and, if not to inspire, at least to excite and inform his readers. Hunter or any other, you will find the same biased view.Īfter the independence, Indian history department was completely filled with communists who hated everything that belonged to ancient India. Julius Caesar, the 'Honourable Company' described by John Keay has more than a little to be ashamed of. ![]() Hence whatever historical events occurred were pushed around 2000 BC - 1500 BC and so on. According to bible, the creation began 4004 BC. They set the chronology of Indian historical events according to the bible. ![]() Another thing was the Christianity that influenced those historians. That's how the "Aryan Invasion Theory" born. The purpose of creating biased Indian history is to strengthen their rule over then India. The funny thing is, the history of India being taught in schools are created by the western people of British East India Company. From the beginning of the creation of Indian history, bias has played an important role. ![]() Your question is the rare one that no one even bothers to ask. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |